Author: Haugen Consulting
ASBATANKVOY -- DEMURRAGE -- DISPORT -- PORT -- BERTH -- ARBITRATION -- LAYTIME -- NOR
In response to the Owners’ claim for demurrage at disport, the Charterers contended that the delays resulted from Owners’ lack of required US port documentation and the subsequently occupied berth when the documents were finally received. Conversely, the Owners cited other arbitrations where the laytime began at NOR despite having lost its turn at berth due to Owner negligence.
ASBATANKVOY -- ARBITRATION -- DEMURRAGE -- VOYAGE -- TUGBOAT -- BERTH -- TIDE -- DAYLIGHT RESTRICTION -- PUMP WARRANTY -- PORT -- Owner Award
This arbitration award settles several pertinent demurrage issues from voyage. These issues include the responsibility for delayed tugboat arrival, demurrage from an occupied berth, Vessel pilot delays, the responsibility to know tidal and daylight port restrictions, and the pump warranty.
ASBATANKVOY -- DEMURRAGE -- ARBITRATION -- INVOICE -- Owner Award
After not receiving any response to their invoices for demurrage, the Owners began arbitration against the Charterers to recover the delay compensation.
ASBATANKVOY -- ARBITRATION -- DEMURRAGE -- CHARTER PARTY -- PUMP WARRANTY -- STOPPAGE -- PORT -- Owner Award
The Owners began arbitration to recover demurrage costs from two consecutive charter parties with the Charterer. The Charterers claim that the demurrage time should be reduced basis an alleged breach of the pump warranty, stoppages during loading, and Owner non-compliance with port authorities.
ASBATANKVOY -- DISPORT -- DEMURRAGE -- BURDEN OF PROOF -- Owner Award
Due to a major Vessel casualty at disport, the Vessel was put on demurrage for an additional 1.5 days. The Charterers argued that this event was beyond their control and should be summarily discounted. The Owners, on the other hand, contend that the Charterers had not satisfied their burden of proof that it was indeed out of their control.
ASBATANKVOY -- LOADPORT -- ANCHORAGE -- TYPHOON -- DEMURRAGE -- Owner Award
The Vessel was forced to wait 28H at loadport anchorage by the Port Authority and Harbor Master because of a typhoon. The Owner counted this time at half the demurrage rate.
ASBATANKVOY -- LOADPORT -- CARGO -- CHILLING -- CHARTER PARTY -- LAYCAN -- TERMINAL -- DEMURRAGE
After substituting the fixed Vessel for the slower-loading subject Vessel, further delays were incurred at loadport due to insufficient cargo chilling per charter requirements. The Owners argued that this extended laycan was faulted by the terminal’s breach of the charter party and claimed any excess loading time as demurrage.
ASBATANKVOY -- LIGHTERING -- CARGO -- DISPORT -- PORT -- ANCHORAGE -- CHARTER PARTY -- BERTH -- DETENTION -- DEMURRAGE -- Partial Owner Award
The Charterer fully loaded the Vessel with the intention of lightering the cargo at disport. However, the Vessel remained at port anchorage for over sixteen days while discharging to lightering vessels. The Owner contended that the Charterer breached the charter party by not procuring a berth reachable upon arrival and therefore demanded damages at the detention rate instead of the demurrage rate.
ASBATANKVOY -- FOOT SAMPLE -- CHARTER PARTY -- REFINERY -- CONTAMINATION -- BALLAST -- SHIFT -- BERTH
After the Vessel failed both a tank inspection and the first foot sample, the Charterers exercised their right to terminate the charter party. However, the Owners insisted on a second foot sample and blamed the first foot sample’s contamination on the Refinery Loading Master’s order to ballast the Vessel during the shift to berth.
ASBATANKVOY -- ARBITRATION -- LAYTIME -- VOYAGE -- PURGING -- DEMURRAGE -- MARITIME -- SHIFTING TIME -- Partial Owner Award
This arbitration award covers several laytime issues between voyage parties. The responsibility for time spent purging the Vessel’s tanks, shifting time, cooling down time, and the application of the maritime maxim "once on demurrage, always on demurrage" are all discussed in the proceedings.
